Optimization of Enterprise Financial Performance Evaluation System Based on AHP and LSTM Against the Background of Carbon Neutrality

Optimization of Enterprise Financial Performance Evaluation System Based on AHP and LSTM Against the Background of Carbon Neutrality

Yuxiting Xie
Copyright: © 2023 |Pages: 14
DOI: 10.4018/JOEUC.332810
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

This study focuses on meticulously examining energy companies' financial performance, incorporating the principles of environmentally sustainable development. The study employs a comprehensive assessment approach that integrates various metrics from different departments of these enterprises. These abstract indicators are primarily quantified using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), emphasizing incorporating low-carbon indicators, such as research and development (R&D) in renewable energy, into the evaluation framework. Subsequently, the study utilizes the long short-term memory (LSTM) model to evaluate the performance of individual departments within these companies. Ultimately, the study provides an overarching evaluation of the financial performance of energy enterprises. The proposed model demonstrates its effectiveness in practical testing, achieving an evaluation error of just 1.7%. Moreover, the research also scrutinizes the implications of these financial evaluation results for the transition toward a low-carbon paradigm.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

The pace of socio-economic development is accelerating while the global environmental climate is undergoing perpetual change. The environment continues to endure ceaseless pollution and degradation, giving rise to phenomena like atmospheric haze, which profoundly impact human existence. The imperative of a low-carbon economy is gaining recognition from an increasing number of nations and individuals, imposing fresh demands on enterprise development, reducing energy consumption, and mitigating pollution and carbon dioxide emissions (Akbari, 2022). Since energy enterprises involve high energy consumption and substantial pollutant emissions, such entities should actively embrace energy-saving measures and emission reduction initiatives. Over time, the world’s total energy supply has steadily expanded, accompanied by ongoing adjustments to and optimizations of the energy structure (Benjaafar et al., 2013). The exploration and study of new energy sources have garnered significant attention from numerous countries, who perceive it as a pivotal avenue for enhancing energy security, addressing climate deterioration, and achieving sustainable development objectives. Backed by supportive national policies, renewable energy technologies are maturing, their deployment is expanding in scale, and their economic viability is improving (Chen et al., 2019). The continuous evolution and transformation of the new energy industry are instigating substantial changes in the development of energy companies. In addition to vigorously pursuing further energy utilization, traditional energy enterprises must engage in long-term planning for their advancement, integrating resources from various existing departments and accurately evaluating their financial performance to facilitate precise strategic deployment (Cho et al., 2019).

Most traditional financial studies focus solely on examining the development of financial crises from the perspective of economic activities. However, they lack a systemic viewpoint that considers the evolutionary process of financial problems. As a result, they encounter challenges in identifying the underlying causes of corporate finance issues, rendering them ineffective for corporate managers (Chen et al., 2019). Hence, there is an urgent need to investigate the evolutionary game behavior among multiple stakeholders in corporate finance and conduct an in-depth analysis of the sector’s current state. An enterprise’s financial system primarily encompasses six subsystems: financing, investment, procurement, production, sales, and profits. These subsystems collectively facilitate the financial cycle of fund acquisition, allocation, utilization, recovery, and distribution (Ukko et al., 2019). Figure 1 illustrates the elements involved in the financial analysis of a company within a multi-entity context (Wu & Huang, 2022).

Figure 1.

Financial risk and management

JOEUC.332810.f01

Figure 1 provides clear insight that within a multi-subject perspective, financial analysis encompasses various domains that entail higher levels of risk. Significant interplay and interdependence among different sectors lead to increased complexity. In the case of energy companies, the involved departments primarily focus on environmental protection, subject to frequent policy changes. Hence, considering the accuracy of financial evaluation from a multi-subject aspect becomes crucial (Deng et al., 2020).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 36: 1 Issue (2024): Forthcoming, Available for Pre-Order
Volume 35: 3 Issues (2023)
Volume 34: 10 Issues (2022)
Volume 33: 6 Issues (2021)
Volume 32: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1990)
Volume 1: 3 Issues (1989)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing